Skip to main content

The AI control gap in New Zealand.

91 percent of New Zealand organisations use AI and 20 percent track its cost in a dedicated budget. What the research says about the gap, and how to close it.

Product
Novie Control
Format
Guide
Reading time
3 min
Published
10 November 2026
In short

The AI control gap is the distance between how widely an organisation uses AI and how much of that use it can see, own and steer. In New Zealand the gap is wide: 91 percent of organisations use AI, and 20 percent have a dedicated AI budget with clear cost tracking, according to Datacom's State of AI Index 2026.

This guide sets out what the published research says about that gap, why it matters for return, and how to close it. Novamind Labs ran no survey for it. Every figure names its publisher and links to the source, read on 9 November 2026.

The control gap in numbers.

Adopting AI takes a licence, an API key or a free account. Controlling it takes a budget, an owner, a policy and a list of approved tools. Datacom asked 207 senior leaders at New Zealand organisations with 100 or more staff about each. AI use is up from 66 percent in 2024.

Datacom, State of AI Index 2026.

TakeawayNine in ten New Zealand organisations use AI. About one in five gives it a tracked budget or a dedicated leader.

Where the gap shows up.

In the cost.

AI cost sits inside cloud bills, software renewals and usage-priced APIs, so it often reaches the invoice before it reaches a budget. One in five New Zealand organisations say they have yet to address AI cost management, and 15 percent have been surprised by AI costs exceeding expectations (Datacom, 2026).

In the tools.

Staff adopted AI before most employers had a view on it. 52 percent of New Zealand leaders call the use of unapproved AI tools a problem in their organisation (Datacom, 2025), and 34 percent of New Zealand employees say they have used AI in ways that go against policy (KPMG and the University of Melbourne, 2025).

In the ownership.

Most organisations have named someone, and for most of those people AI is a second job. Responsibility for AI is added to an existing executive role in 26 percent of New Zealand organisations and shared across several executives in 19 percent (Datacom, 2026).

TakeawayThe gap is visible in three places: cost with no budget, tools with no approval and ownership as an extra duty.

Why it matters: return follows control.

The organisations that can see what AI costs are the ones that can show what it returns. KPMG's Global AI Pulse for the second quarter of 2026 found established ROI at 15 percent among organisations with full visibility of their AI operating costs, against 3 percent without it.

KPMG, Global AI Pulse Q2 2026.

New Zealand shows the same pattern from the other side. A third of organisations say returns from AI have exceeded costs, and 9 percent are not formally measuring AI return at all (Datacom, 2026).

TakeawayFull visibility of AI costs goes with a five times higher rate of established ROI.

Why control is a local choice in New Zealand.

New Zealand published its first national AI strategy on 8 July 2025, the last OECD country to do so. It takes a light-touch approach and adds no new AI law, which leaves the controls around AI to each organisation. 64 percent of New Zealand business leaders want specific AI legislation and controls (Datacom, 2026).

TakeawayWith no national rulebook, each organisation's AI is judged by its own controls.

How to close the gap.

  1. Govern. Give every AI tool, model and agent a named owner and a budget before it runs.
  2. Build. Start each use of AI from a business case that states the return it should make.
  3. Run. Bring AI cost across providers, models and teams into one view, with limits that hold.
  4. Compound. Share what one team proves, with its owner, cost and controls attached, so it is built once.

TakeawayGovern first, so that everything built and run afterwards starts inside the controls.

How Novie Control does it.

Novie ControlAvailable now

Governance and accountability.

Give every workload a named owner, a budget and clear boundaries.

1,284

calls governed today.

Sources

  1. Datacom, State of AI Index 2026 (September 2026)
  2. Datacom, 2026 State of AI Index: AI uptake at 91%, leadership lags (September 2026)
  3. Datacom, State of AI Index 2025
  4. KPMG New Zealand and the University of Melbourne, Trust, attitudes and use of AI: New Zealand snapshot (May 2025)
  5. KPMG International, Growing adoption signals progress as cost visibility and accountability drive AI value (24 June 2026)
  6. KPMG International, Global AI Pulse Q2 2026 (June 2026)
  7. MBIE, New Zealand's Strategy for Artificial Intelligence (July 2025)
  8. RNZ, Government unveils its first-ever national artificial intelligence strategy (8 July 2025)

Other articles

Frequently asked questions

What is the AI control gap?

The AI control gap is the distance between how widely an organisation uses AI and how much of that use it can see, own and steer. It shows up as AI cost with no budget, tools nobody approved and ownership that is an extra duty.

How many New Zealand organisations use AI?

91 percent of New Zealand organisations with 100 or more staff use some form of AI, up from 66 percent in 2024, according to Datacom's State of AI Index 2026, a survey of 207 senior leaders.

How many New Zealand organisations track AI costs?

20 percent have a dedicated AI budget with clear cost tracking, and one in five say they have yet to address AI cost management, according to Datacom's State of AI Index 2026.

Does controlling AI cost improve AI ROI?

KPMG's Global AI Pulse for the second quarter of 2026 found established ROI at 15 percent among organisations with full visibility of AI operating costs, against 3 percent without it, from 2,145 senior leaders in 20 countries.

Build the intelligenceyour organisation compounds.